Review of Respiratory Medicine - Volumen 25, N�mero 1 - March 2025

Original Articles

Expectations of Pulmonologists Regarding Continuing Medical Education in Relation to Available Methods After the COVID-19 Pandemic

Expectativas de los neumonólogos sobre la educación médica continua en relación con los métodos disponibles después de la pandemia de COVID-19

Autor : Ibarrola, Manuel1, Falco, Jimena1, Heres, Marcela1, Quadrelli, Silvia1

1Sanatorio Güemes, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires

https://doi.org/10.56538/ramr.XRCW5287

Correspondencia : Manuel Ibarrola. E-mail: cm.ibarrola@gmail.com

ABSTRACT

Continuing Medical Education (CME) is essential to ensure that healthcare professionals stay updated on advances and changes in their field. However, CME faces a series of challenges that limit its effectiveness and scope, including lack of time and resources, limited accessibility, and the need for greater collaboration and coordination among continuing medical education organizations.

This work provides valuable information about the working conditions of doctors, con­tinuing medical education, and participation in research projects, as well as the impact of the COVID pandemic on them.

Key words: Education, Medical, Continuing, Working Conditions, COVID 19

RESUMEN

La educación médica continua (EMC) es fundamental para asegurar que los profesio­nales de la salud estén actualizados en cuanto a los avances y cambios en su campo. Sin embargo, la EMC se enfrenta a una serie de desafíos que limitan su efectividad y alcance, entre los que se incluye la falta de tiempo y recursos, la accesibilidad limitada, y la necesidad de una mayor colaboración y coordinación entre las organizaciones de formación médica continua.

El presente trabajo proporciona información valiosa sobre las condiciones de trabajo de los médicos, la educación médica continua y la participación en proyectos de inves­tigación, así como el impacto de la pandemia COVID en ellos

Palabras clave: Educación Médica Continua, Condiciones laborales, COVID 19

Recibido: 05/23/2024

Aceptado: 10/26/2024

INTRODUCTION

Continuing Medical Education (CME) is essential to ensure that healthcare professionals stay up­dated on advances and changes in their field. How­ever, CME faces a series of challenges that limit its effectiveness and scope, including lack of time and resources, limited accessibility, and the need for greater collaboration and coordination among continuing medical education organizations.

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted CME and has brought about changes in the attitudes and motivations of physicians. The need to quickly incorporate knowledge about various aspects of an entirely new topic, the de­mand for new education formats compatible with isolation, and the influx of information with lower levels of processing and evidence have generated enormous pressure and some uncertainty. On the other hand, the pandemic has also affected the availability of resources and time for continuing education. During the pandemic, physicians and other healthcare professionals have faced signifi­cant demands and pressures due to the workload and the challenges of providing healthcare in a context of crisis.

After the pandemic, there was a decreased demand for traditional CME formats (face-to-face courses, workshops, conferences) as well as certain disinterest in both intensive and low-intensity educational proposals. We can’t ignore the fact that the lack of recognition and support for physicians has generated discontent and frustration in some cases, which lead to some of them seeking new job opportunities or even con­sidering leaving the profession. Regarding this reality observed in daily professional practice, Drs. Silvia Quadrelli, Rosa Estevan, and Lilian Capone conducted a survey in 2021 to evaluate the impact of the pandemic on the work and economic aspects of pulmonologists and kinesiologists in the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires (CABA). The survey wasn’t published, but it was presented at the 49th Argentine Congress of Respiratory Medicine. It revealed several important findings:

• the number of professionals considering leaving their medical social work tripled (from 14.9% to 49.4%)

• 58.6% of respondents increased the number of in-person working hours, while approximately the same amount (57.5%) reported earning less during the pandemic

• 50.6% stated that they had not regained their pre-pandemic income levels

• 51.7% of respondents felt that society did not value their work during the pandemic, while 37.9% felt it was only partially valued

• 48.2% reported having less satisfaction with be­ing a healthcare professional during and after the pandemic

These data support the general observation that job satisfaction among physicians is lower after the pandemic, but it is unclear how much this depends on the different factors (including their work en­vironment, the quality of care they can provide, the support they receive from their employers and society, and their ability to maintain a work-life balance) or what their expectations are regarding different educational formats. This study aims to contribute to a better understanding of the edu­cational landscape in order to be able to promote policies and practices that address these factors, which in turn may help improve satisfaction with educational proposals after the pandemic.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 310 surveys were distributed among pulmonolo­gists currently practicing in Argentina. These surveys were created using Google Forms and were distributed digitally via the WhatsApp application to private mobile phones, sent individually. The spectrum of respondents included all levels of training (from physicians completing their training as pulmonologists to senior pulmonologists with many years of practice). There were no restrictions to be included in the sample as long as all the responses were completed. The responses were received online and were anonymous. The survey included 23 questions related to demographic data, type of professional practice, educational topics and formats of interest, desired and actual time allocated for continuing medical education, and obstacles to achieving the necessary goals.

Descriptive statistics methods were used. For group comparisons, Student’s t-test or chi-square tests were used.

RESULTS

230 responses were obtained from the 310 distributed surveys (74.1%). Table 1 details the characteristics of the surveyed population (age and type of medical practice). The average time dedicated to outpatient care was 71.3% (range 0 to 100%, SD 27.2%). Additionally, 73% of the doc­tors devoted more than 60% of their practice to outpatient care.

Table 1. Characteristics of the surveyed population
Imagen

When asked if institutional consultation spaces were available to discuss their patients, 56.1% responded that they were always available when needed, while only 8.3% said they were never available.

81.7% considered that they weren’t dedicating enough time to their Continuing Medical Educa­tion (CME). The dedicated average time was 6.2 hours per week with a wide dispersion (range 0 to 14; SD 3.8). The most common cause was work obligations (73%), and the influence of the quality of educational formats was only 11% (Table 2).

Table 2. What is the main reason why you dedicate little time to your continuing medical education?
Imagen

Regarding face-to-face educational events, only 33% (n = 76) reported having attended 40% or more of the face-to-face events they were aware of, while attendance at online events was higher, at 44.3% (n = 102, p < 0.001).

The activities considered the most useful as educational formats were the Thematic Confer­ences of the Argentinian Association of Respira­tory Medicine (AAMR, for its acronym in Spanish), and the least favored were the activities organized by the industry itself. (Figure 1). Most educational formats were considered quite useful or very use­ful (Table 3).

Imagen
Figure 1. Which is the educational format you consider the most useful?
Table 3. How useful are the different educational formats in your opinion?
Imagen

Regarding the completion of intensive activities, 69.5% (n = 160) considered rotations of one or two weeks in high-complexity Argentinian institutions to be quite or very useful, and 53.4% considered them useful as long as they lasted one month. In the analysis of the usefulness and feasibility of rotations of at least one month in foreign institu­tions, 52.1% found them useful or very useful.

When asked about their interest in participat­ing in research projects (even considering that they require time and effort), 53% would be very interested and only 9.6% would not be interested in participating in multi-institutional projects. In the case of projects that would only involve their institution, 44% were very interested and 11.7% were not interested. The higher interest in participating in multi-institutional projects was statistically significant (p = 0.046).

Populations older and younger than 40 years were compared. There weren’t differences in the frequency of attendance at face-to-face events (p = 0.18) and virtual events (p = 0.20). There was a statistically significant higher prevalence of financial concerns as the cause of a decreased dedication to CME in the population under 40 years old (37.5% vs 20.7%; p = 0.02).

The respondents were asked to rate the differ­ent components of an educational event (where 0 meant “I don’t value it” and 10 meant “I value it very much”). The average ratings for a Congress or Thematic Conference were as follows: expert talks 7.83 ± 2.0, case presentations 7.51 ± 2,36, practical workshops 8.17 ± 2.16 and interactive questions 7.69 ± 2.1.

The presence of international experts, and to a lesser extent, of national experts, along with the possibility of active participation (presenting cases, asking questions, interacting with the experts), were the factors considered as the most influential when deciding whether to attend an event or not (Figure 2).

Imagen
Figure 2. What circumstances would encourage you to participate in an event? (would somewhat or greatly increase your interest in participating)

In response to the question, “How comfortable and satisfied with your profession do you feel com­pared to what you felt pre-pandemic?”, 40% said that they felt worse, while 19.1% said that they felt better. 28.2% (n = 65) identified the phrase “I am overwhelmed by my economic situation” as best defining their current situation; 35.2% (n = 81) declared that they felt the impact of society and/ or institutions not recognizing the value of their work, and 25.6% (n = 59) acknowledged being overwhelmed by the bureaucratic burden.

DISCUSSION

Regarding the objective of the present work, the survey demonstrated that:

-The majority of the surveyed physicians spend most of their time treating outpatients, and more than a third of them treat patients from trade union-related health insurance and those with prepaid medical care.

-Most of the surveyed physicians reported that they do not dedicate enough time to their continu­ing education. The main obstacles to dedicating the necessary time to CME are the lack of time, workload, and economic concerns, while the qual­ity of educational formats does not seem to be a determining factor in the physicians’ perception of the attractiveness and adherence to educational of­ferings. Both face-to-face and the well-established virtual formats seem to maintain the interest of the majority of the postgraduate educational community.

-The respondents highlighted the importance of rotations in high-complexity institutions, both in Argentina and abroad, to improve their training. It has long been accepted that medicine is not just an accumulation of knowledge but requires the development of technical, cognitive, and emotional abilities, for which training oriented towards skill acquisition is definitely necessary.

-The majority of the surveyed physicians ex­pressed interest in participating in research projects, especially if they are multi-institutional.

-According to the survey results, physicians value the possibility of interacting with colleagues and experts in the field of pulmonology.

EURACT (European Academy of Teachers in General Practice) and other medical organizations recommend interactive teaching techniques, which are a mandatory part of the combination of differ­ent teaching models for general practitioners in most European countries.1 The optimal combina­tion of teaching methods in the training of medical professionals—such as learning in specific spaces (classes, workshops), in practice, or at home, as well as the appropriate use of information and communications technology (ICT)—has been found to be a blended learning system that can yield the best results.2

The data presented in this work cannot be analyzed outside the context described by the re­spondents themselves. Under normal conditions, adults want to learn, are self-directed, and need learning to be relevant and applicable in their environment; when these conditions are met, they are highly motivated.3 However, it is alarming to highlight such a high proportion of physicians un­der 40 years old with financial concerns that affect their dedication to continuing medical education.

Research on the negative implications of medi­cal burnout is abundant, with key insights estab­lished long before the onset and ongoing burden of the COVID-19 pandemic. Hodkinson et al ana­lyzed 170 observational studies involving 239,246 physicians in a large systematic review and meta-analysis examining the association between medi­cal burnout, career commitment, and the quality of patient care. They demonstrated that burnout was associated with a three to nearly fourfold increase in the likelihood of job dissatisfaction and regrets about career choice, and that physicians who had suffered burnout were three times more likely to consider leaving the profession.4

A 2018 report by the Merritt Hawkins Medi­cal Foundation found that 46% of the surveyed physicians were planning to leave their current position within the following three years.5 In 2020, the turnover rate for registered nurses in the U.S. increased by 2.8%, reaching 18.7% currently, and for physicians specifically, the turnover rate is es­timated to be around 28% for those in hospitals.6 According to global projections, by 2030, 80 million qualified healthcare professionals will be needed, but probably they won’t be available.7

This study has obvious limitations, and its main purpose is to serve as a starting point for the formation of multidisciplinary working groups from different areas of the healthcare system in Argentina. It should be noted that the sample size is relatively small and almost exclusively includes physicians from the Argentinian Asso­ciation of Respiratory Medicine. Therefore, the results may not be representative of the general medical population in Argentina. The survey is self-reported, which may affect the accuracy of the results. Despite these limitations, this study provides evidence showing that physicians seek certain characteristics in educational experiences: they look for educational experiences that are rel­evant to their clinical practice and help them im­prove their performance. Courses and workshops should be oriented towards practical problems encountered in daily medical practice. Interactiv­ity is essential; experiences that allow interaction among participants are highly valued. Physicians prefer those courses where they can discuss real cases, ask questions, and receive feedback from col­leagues and experts. They require innovation and value experiences that offer new perspectives and strategies to improve their clinical practice It will be necessary to incorporate innovative technolo­gies, such as virtual reality or machine learning, to adapt to the needs of the highly digitalized new generations.

Conflict of interests:

Authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

REFERENCES

1. Granek-Catarivas M, Zarbailov N, Karppinen H, et al. EURACT Abstract Book, Medical Education Conference “Family Medicine Education in the Real World: From Theory into Practice. 2018; 66.

2. Sinclair P, Kable A, Levett-Jones T. The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol. JBI Evidence Synthesis. 2015;13:52–64.

3. Vannieuwenborg L. Continuing medical education for general Practitioners; A practice format. Postgrad Med J 2016; 0:1–6.

4. Hodkinson A, Zhou A, Geraghty JJ, Riley K, Zhou R. Asso­ciations of physician burnout with career engagement and quality of patient care: systematic review and meta-analysis BMJ. 2022;378. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-070442

5. Age A. Care/Specialists, P. (s/f). Practice Patterns & Per­spectives. Merritthawkins.com. 24 de abril de 2023, https://www.merritthawkins.com/uploadedFiles/MerrittHawkins/Content/Pdf/MerrittHawkins_PhysiciansFoundation_Survey2018.pdf

6. (2017). Emergingrnleader.com. https://www.emergingrnleader.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/NationalHealthcareRNRetentionReport2017.pdf)

7. Ramos V. (2022, octubre 25). A public health crisis: Staffing shortages in health care. Online Masters in Public Health. https://mphdegree.usc.edu/blog/a-closer-look-at-the-public-health-workforce-crisis/

Compartir Artículo
Galería de imágenes
Mujer joven con afectación pulmonar bilateral y alteración de la conciencia

Autores:

Churin Lisandro
Ibarrola Manuel

img Ir ahora
Esta es una publicación
Open Access