Autor : Cristina Borrajo 1,2
1Sub-coordinator of the Tobacco Section of the AAMR (Argentinian Association of Respiratory Medicine). 2 Former AAMR president
https://doi.org/10.56538/ramr.BZWY7721
Correspondencia
“Do as I say, not as I do”
Séneca
The recent study on the
prevalence and attitudes toward tobacco use among healthcare workers at
Hospital de Especialidades Axxis
in Quito, Ecuador, presents relevant findings that justify a broader debate on
the role of healthcare professionals in tobacco control.
HEALTHCARE WORKERS AS ROLE MODELS
Healthcare professionals are
regarded as role models in promoting healthy lifestyles. Their behaviors and
attitudes significantly influence their patients and society in general. The
effectiveness of prevention policies partly depends on the commitment of
healthcare workers, as well as their attitudes and behaviors regarding tobacco
use. This makes them key social figures in the fight against tobacco and role
models for healthy behavior.1 However, the
study revealed that nearly 20% of workers at Hospital Axxis
are current or former smokers. Although this figure is lower than the national
prevalence in Ecuador, estimated at 11.5%, the fact that those who play a
crucial role in health promotion continue to engage in this harmful habit is
still an issue of concern. Various studies have highlighted this situation over
time and in different parts of the world.2,3 Nevertheless,
tobacco use among healthcare professionals continues to be a challenge in the
fight against smoking.
THE PARADOX OF KNOWLEDGE AND BEHAVIOR
One of the most striking findings
is the higher prevalence of smoking among physicians compared to administrative
staff. This paradox highlights a crucial issue: knowledge alone is not
enough to change behavior. Despite being trained in the risks of smoking,
many doctors continue to smoke, largely due to high levels of stress and work
pressure. While healthcare professionals understand the dangers of tobacco,
they continue using it. This suggests that factors such as stress, workload,
and social influences play a decisive role in this behavior. However, the
biological factors inherent to smoking cannot be overlooked in this analysis.
It is an addictive disease primarily driven by nicotine.4
This substance initiates and sustains the
addictive behavior over time. Nicotine is one of the most addictive drugs known,5 comparable to
cocaine and heroin. Reducing smoking to a mere “habit” or “vice” oversimplifies
the complexity of the problem. Healthcare workers, like the rest of the population,
are not exempt from this reality.
The
link between knowledge and behavior is clearly evident in the general
population. Most adult smokers are aware of the harmful effects of tobacco on
their health, at least to some degree. However, many feel incapable of quitting
or believe they can postpone it indefinitely.
Nicotine
addiction is a complex phenomenon. Beyond its biological basis— which involves
the activation of neural receptors and the release of psychoactive
substances—other factors contribute to its persistence: ease of access, its
legal status, low social condemnation, and the influence of the tobacco
industry through advertising and product promotion.
Given
this scenario, tobacco treatment must also address multiple dimensions. While
physical abstinence can and should be managed with drugs of proven efficacy,
the social, cultural, and psychological aspects of dependence require equal
attention. In this regard, cognitive-behavioral therapy and psychological
support should be considered as fundamental pillars of treatment.6
THE IMPORTANCE OF SUPPORT SYSTEMS
The study also highlights the
importance of having effective support systems for quitting smoking. A
significant percentage of healthcare workers expressed a strong interest in
quitting, with 60% planning to do so within the next six months and 53% within
the next 15 days. In the general population, up to 70% of adult smokers wish
to quit; however, without assistance, the success rate is very low
(approximately 5%).7 The success of these attempts often depends on access to
cessation programs and professional support. The approach and appropriate
treatment for smokers have been described8
and updated over time, and all smokers should have access to
these resources. The fact that most quit attempts were made without specialized
help reveals a gap in the support system that has to be addressed. It is
essential to develop psychological support programs, individual and/or group
therapy, and ensure access to pharmacological treatments that increase the
chances of successful smoking cessation.
IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH POLICY
The findings of the study at
Hospital Axxis underscore the need for healthcare
institutions to implement stricter policies of tobacco control. This could
include banning smoking across all hospital facilities, offering free smoking
cessation programs for staff, regularly monitoring tobacco use among employees,
and integrating educational modules on smoking into ongoing healthcare
training. It could include monitoring tobacco use regularly among employees,
access to specialized programs to quit smoking, and the creation of an
environment that encourages tobacco cessation. Additionally, healthcare
professionals should receive training on how to counsel their patients in
quitting smoking, as their personal experiences and attitudes can influence
their effectiveness as advisors.
CONCLUSION
The role of healthcare workers in
tobacco control is fundamental. They are not only responsible for their own
health but must also serve as role models for their patients and the community.
However, like the rest of the population, many healthcare professionals also
struggle with tobacco dependence.
For
this reason, healthcare institutions should implement support systems at two
levels: on one hand, monitoring smokers through periodic surveys or other
mechanisms, and on the other, offering assistance through counseling and
personalized treatments.
Additionally,
promoting smoke-free hospitals and healthcare centers encourages healthy
behaviors among the staff and the patients. The study conducted at Hospital Axxis highlights the importance of having comprehensive
strategies to support healthcare professionals in quitting smoking and adopting
a tobacco-free lifestyle. By doing so, they will not only strengthen their role
as health advocates but also contribute to building a healthier society.
Conflict of interest
The author have
no conflicts of interest to declare.
REFERENCES
1. Robledo de Dios T, Saiz Martínez-Acitores I, Gil López E. Los profesionales
sanitarios y el tabaquismo. Trastornos adictivos. 1999;1:117-23.
https://www.elsevier.es/es-revista-trastornos-adictivos-182-articulo-los-profesionales-sanitarios-el-tabaquismo-13010688
2. Fernández Ruiz ML, Sánchez Bayle M. Prevalencia de consumo de tabaco entre las medicas y enfermeras de la comunidad de Madrid. Rev Esp Salud Publica [online].
1999;73:355-64.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1135-57271999000300004
3. Arenas Monreal L, Hernández Tezoquipa
I, Rogelio Jasso V, Martínez PC, Menjivar
Rubio A. Prevalencia de tabaquismo de médicos y enfermeras en los
estados de Morelos y Guajanato. Rev
Inst Nal Enf Resp Méx
2004;17:261-5.
4. Asociación Americana de Psiquiatría,
Manual diagnóstico y estadístico de los trastornos mentales
(DSM-5®), 5ª Ed. Arlington, VA, Asociación Americana de
Psiquiatría, 2014
5. American Addiction Centers. Most Addictive Drugs. Disponible en: http://americanaddictioncenters.org/adult-addiction-treatmentprograms/most-addictive/
6. Granda Orive Ji. Dependencia por el tabaco. El tabaquismo
como enfermedad adictiva crónica. En: Jiménez-Ruiz CA y Solano
Reina S (eds.). Tabaquismo. Monografías NEUMOMADRID; Vol
VII. Madrid: Ediciones Ergon; 2004; p. 53-69.
7. Babb S, Malarcher
A, Schauer G, Asman K,
Jamal A. Quitting Smoking Among Adults - United States, 2000-2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2017;65:1457-64. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6552a1
8. Clinical Practice Guideline
Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence 2008 Update Panel, Liaisons, and Staff. A
clinical practice guideline for treating tobacco use and dependence: 2008
update. A U.S. Public Health Service report. Am J Prev Med 2008;35:158-76.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.04.009