Review of Respiratory Medicine - Volumen 24, Número 3 - September 24

Review Article

CT Findings in Organizing Pneumonia

Hallazgos tomográficos en neumonía en organización


Autor Fernando, Di Tullio1, Tamara, Decima1

1 Pulmonology Service. Hospital Británico, Buenos Aires, Argentina

https://doi.org/10.56538/ramr.ymfw-ezge

Correspondencia : Fernando Di Tullio. E-mail: fer_dit@hotmail.com

ABSTRACT

Organizing pneumonia consists of the presence of granulomatous inflammation in the small airways, alveolar ducts, and alveoli. It is a nonspecific pathological response that can occur when there is a pulmonary injury. Cryptogenic organizing pneumonia is a specific clinical and pathological entity for which no etiology has been found. It can pres­ent with different patterns in tomographic studies, some of which are highly suggestive of this condition, while others are nonspecific. The objective of this review is to describe the tomographic characteristics of organizing pneumonia.

Key words: Cryptogenic organizing pneumonia, Reversed halo sign, Interstitial lung diseases

RESUMEN

La neumonía en organización consiste en la presencia de inflamación granulomatosa localizada en la pequeña vía aérea, conductos alveolares y alvéolos. Es una respuesta patológica no específica que puede generarse ante alguna lesión pulmonar. Existe la neumonía en organización criptogénica, entidad específica, clínica y patológica, en la cual no se encuentra una etiología. Puede presentarse con diferentes patrones en los estudios tomográficos, de los cuales algunos de ellos son muy sugestivos de esta entidad, mientras otros son inespecíficos. El objetivo de esta revisión es describir las características tomográficas de la neumonía en organización.

Palabras clave: Neumonía en organización criptogénica, Signo del halo invertido, Enfermedades pulmonares intersticiales

Received: 10/06/2023

Accepted: 02/09/2024

INTRODUCTION

Organizing pneumonia (OP) consists of the pres­ence of granulomatous inflammation in the small airways, alveolar ducts, and alveoli.1 It is a nonspe­cific pathological response that can occur following any pulmonary injury, such as infections, exposure to smoke or toxic gases, radiotherapy, connective tissue diseases, neoplasms, and drug toxicity.2 When potential causes of this condition are ruled out, it is called cryptogenic organizing pneumonia (COP). This is a specific clinical and pathological entity of unknown etiology, first described in 1983,3 and is considered an idiopathic interstitial lung disease.4 Histopathologically, granulation tissue is generated by part of the alveolar epithelium in response to injury, accumulating within the alveoli and spreading through the alveolar ducts and terminal bronchioles. These intraluminal ac­cumulations of loose granulation tissue are known as Masson bodies.5,6 The condition typically ap­pears between the 5th and 6th decades of life, has no gender preference, and non-smokers may be at higher risk.7 The most commonly found symp­toms are a mostly non-productive cough, fever, dyspnea, and general malaise, with less frequent occurrences of chest pain, arthralgia, and weight loss. The most characteristic findings on physi­cal examination are crackles, with less frequent occurrences of cyanosis and wheezing.8 There is currently no laboratory finding that confirms this disease, though half of the patients will have leukocytosis, and it is common to see elevated acute-phase reactants such as erythrocyte sedi­mentation rate and C-reactive protein.9 Some of the tomographic findings are often suggestive of this disease, allowing for a presumptive diagnosis prior to histological confirmation.

CT FINDINGS

Ground glass opacities and consolidations

The most characteristic findings consist of bi­lateral and asymmetric consolidations. The dis­tribution is predominantly subpleural, and less frequently, peribronchovascular, or a combination of both, and may be associated with ground-glass opacities9 (Figure 1). When there is bronchocen­tric or peribronchovascular involvement, it often affects the lower lobes, and the air bronchogram sign can be observed10 (Figure 2). These opacities may migrate within a few weeks, although this has not been evidenced in the majority of patients.7

Imagen
Figure 1. 77-year-old male patient with rapidly progressive dyspnea, diagnosed with OP through cryobiopsy. The imaging shows predominantly subpleural consolidations associated with some areas of ground-glass opacities and consolidations located in the right lower lobe, associated with air bronchogram.
Imagen
Figure 2. 47-year-old female patient hospitalized due to symptoms of cough, back pain, asthenia, and fever, with no response to antibiotic treatment. The patient was diagnosed with COP through transbronchial biopsy. Imaging revealed consolidations in both lower lobes, with air bronchogram sign.

Patients often respond to steroid treatment, but the disease may relapse in different lobes or in different segments within the same lobe when the dose is reduced or if the treatment is interrupted11 (Figure 3).

Imagen
Figure 3. 71-year-old male patient diagnosed with OP secondary to prolonged COVID-19. A: initial imag­ing showed ground-glass opacity with a tendency towards consolidation, bronchocentric, and located in the right lower lobe. B: new CT scan taken 20 days after starting treatment with systemic steroids showed significant resolution of the image, with persisting linear opacity parallel to the pleura. C: three months after starting treatment, during the tapering of steroid doses, a relapse was observed in the right lower lobe, associated with ground-glass opacity in the middle lobe. D: eight months after the diagnosis, following the completion of systemic steroid treatment, there was a new relapse, with band-like consolidation in the middle lobe and faint ground-glass opacities in the right lower lobe.

 

Consolidation bands

In OP, consolidation bands that extend from the hilum to the pleura can be observed, leaving the pleura intact. These bands are over 8 mm thick and may sometimes present with an air broncho­gram.12,13 Curved linear consolidations parallel to the pleura can also be observed. These signs are characteristic of OP and have been suggested to correspond to linear atelectasis secondary to proximal airway involvement9 (Figures 4 and 5). This finding, from a tomographic evaluation, does not indicate interstitial involvement, as it does not correspond to the contour of the secondary pulmonary lobule.14

Imagen
Figure 4. 47-year-old female patient who experienced a relapse of COP when the dose of systemic steroids was reduced. A: imaging shows a band of consolidation extending from the hilum to the pleura, located in the right upper lobe (arrow), associated with a consolidation in the lower lobe (asterisk). B: also, a band of consolidation is seen parallel to the pleura in the left upper lobe.
Imagen
Figure 5. 72-year-old male patient diagnosed with lymphoma and OP. Imaging shows a band of consolidation parallel to the pleura, located in the right lower lobe (arrow).

Perilobular consolidations

This refers to the presence of arched and curvilin­ear consolidations, distributed around the second­ary lobules, that often come into contact with the pleura. They can be located anywhere, but occur predominantly in the middle and lower lobes, with both peribronchovascular and subpleural distribu­tion.12 They are often accompanied by ground-glass opacities or consolidations.9 The presence of these changes is not indicative of fibrosis. This is a spe­cific sign of OP and has been reported to represent 57% of tomographic findings15 (Figures 6 and 7).

Imagen
Figure 6. 49-year-old female patient, diagnosed with vasculitis, who was hospitalized due to dyspnea and respiratory failure. She was diagnosed with OP through transbronchial biopsy. Imaging revealed perilobular consolidations with bilateral distribution, predominantly in the lower lobes.
Imagen
Figure 7. Female patient with a diagnosis of COP who experi­enced a relapse during the tapering of systemic steroids. Imaging shows perilobular opacities located in the right upper lobe (ar­rows), associated with consolidations in the apical segment of the right lower lobe (asterisk).

Nodular images

OP can present with nodular images, described as less than 5 mm (micronodules) and over 10 mm, with random and bilateral distribution.13,15 The nodules may have well-defined or spiculated margins, so a differential diagnosis with metastatic cancer should be made.12 These nodules can also cavitate or present with a halo sign. They may coexist with other tomographic patterns (Figure 8). OP can also manifest as a solitary pulmonary nodule, which could be due to a localized injury, such as an infectious process14 (Figure 9).

Imagen
Figure 9. 52-year-old female patient who consulted for back pain and asthenia. Pulmonary embolism was ruled out. Imaging revealed a solitary pulmonary nodule with a central ground-glass opacity surrounded by a partially complete ring of consolidation (reversed halo sign), located in the left lower lobe.

Reversed halo sign (atoll sign)

The reversed halo sign, also known as the atoll sign (a ring-shaped island with an inner lagoon)16 refers to the presence of an area of ground-glass opacity surrounded by a complete or partially complete ring of consolidation.17 It was first de­scribed in 2 patients with cryptogenic organizing pneumonia (COP), and it was initially considered a pathognomonic finding of OP. However, over time, other etiologies have been described, primarily infectious, that present with the same image.18,19 The findings in the consolidative portion are significant, since the granular appearance is sug­gestive of active granulomatous disease, such as tuberculosis and sarcoidosis.20 The reversed halo sign is one of the most specific findings of OP and has been reported to be present in 19% of patients with OP21 (Figure 10).

Imagen
Figure 10. A: male patient with a diagnosis of OP who experienced a relapse after reducing the dose of systemic steroids. Imaging shows the reversed halo sign or atoll sign, located in the right upper lobe. B: female patient with COP who experienced a relapse after reducing the dose of systemic steroids. Imaging shows the reversed halo sign in both upper lobes.

Fibrosing pattern

During the progression of the disease, reticula­tions and even honeycombing may appear, pre­dominantly in the basal segments of the lower lobes, along with traction bronchiectasis and loss of lung volume. These findings can coexist with other tomographic patterns.12 Some series describe a high percentage of residual lesions in the tomography, whose characteristics sug­gest a pattern of fibrotic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP). This progression to fibrotic lesions can be seen in rheumatic diseases such as antisynthetase syndrome.22 OP can also present as an added component of another interstitial lung disease, such as NSIP or hypersensitivity pneumonitis, or it may be part of the exacerbation of an interstitial lung disease.14

DISCUSSION

OP represents a process of lung repair second­ary to certain known injuries (secondary OP) or idiopathic injuries (COP). There are ongoing controversies about whether these are different entities or if they belong to the same pathology. So far, no substantial differences have been found between these groups in terms of tomographic findings, clinical characteristics, or evolution.7,23 When evaluating these patients to determine the etiology of OP, it is important to create detailed medical records, including signs and symptoms of rheumatological diseases with the corresponding evaluation of autoantibodies, use of medications and illicit drugs, history of thoracic radiotherapy, ruling out pulmonary infectious diseases, including respiratory viruses, and considering the exposure history.8

The most specific tomographic signs of OP are perilobular consolidations, consolidation bands, and the reversed halo sign. Recognizing these images could lead to a diagnosis in many cases, in the context of a multidisciplinary team discussion, thereby avoiding the need for a biopsy. However, the most frequent signs are consolidations as­sociated with ground-glass opacities, which are not very specific,13 making the recognition of OP more difficult. Nodular patterns would imply a differential diagnosis with neoplastic or infec­tious conditions, possibly requiring some invasive method for the diagnosis.

A definitive diagnosis requires a lung biopsy, with a good yield from transbronchial biopsy, showing a sensitivity of 64% and a specificity of 86%,24 and even higher yield from surgical lung biopsy.1 This not only allows for a definitive di­agnosis but also helps detect underlying causes of OP. CT-guided transthoracic needle biopsy has demonstrated a diagnostic accuracy of 87.9% in a retrospective study.25 Currently, transbronchial cryobiopsy seems to be a safe and efficient method in specialized centers.26

OP has good response to treatment with sys­temic steroids, which can lead to complete remis­sion. However, relapses are common, occurring in approximately 50% of the cases in some series, appearing either in the same affected lobes or in different lobes with same or different topographic patterns. Among the risk factors associated with relapses are the presence of fever, elevated C-reactive protein, reduced diffusion capacity of carbon monoxide, extensive lung involvement, presence of traction bronchiectasis, and delay in treatment initiation, as well as partial remission with treatment.27,28,29 Although most patients achieve complete resolution, some may be left with residual changes, such as airspace occupation or altered lung architecture.14

In conclusion, we emphasize the importance of recognizing tomographic patterns such as the reversed halo sign, perilobular consolidations, and consolidation bands, which are indicative of this condition.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

REFERENCES

1. Cottin V, Cordier JF. Cryptogenic Organizing Pneumonia. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;33:462-75. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1325157

2. Cordier JF. Cryptogenic organizing pneumonia. Clin Chest Med. 2004;25:727-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccm.2004.06.003

3. Davison AG, Heard BE, McAllister WA, et al. Cryptogenic organizing pneumonitis. Q J Med. 1983;52:382-94.

4. American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society. American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society International Multidisciplinary Consensus Classifica­tion of the Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias. This joint statement of the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS) was adopted by the ATS board of directors, June 2001 and by the ERS Execu­tive Committee, June 2001. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;165:277-304.

5. Epler G. Bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:158-64. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.161.2.158

6. Peyrol S, Cordier J, Grimaud J. Intra-alveolar fibrosis ofidiopathic bronchiolitis obliterans-organizing pneumonia. Cell-matrix patterns. Am J Pathol. 1990;70:137-55.

7. Drakopanagiotakis F, Paschalaki K, Abu-Hijleh M. Cryp­togenic and Secondary Organizing Pneumonia CHEST 2011;139:893-900. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.10-0883

8. Raghu G, Meyer KC. Cryptogenic organising pneu­monia: current understanding of an enigmatic lung disease. Eur Respir Rev. 2021;30:210094. https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0094-2021

9. Zare Mehrjardi M, Kahkouee S, Pourabdollah M. Radio-pathological correlation of organizing pneumonia (OP): a pictorial review. Br J Radiol. 2017;90:20160723. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20160723

10. Lee KS, Kullnig P, Hartman TE, Müller NL. Cryptogenic organizing pneumonia: CT findings in 43 patients. Am J Roentgenol. 1994;162:543-6. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.162.3.8109493

11. Zhou Y, Wang L, Huang M. A long-term retrospective study of patients with biopsy-proven cryptogenic organiz­ing pneumonia. Chron Respir Dis 2019;16:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/1479973119853829

12. Baque-Juston M, Pellegrin A, Leroy S, Marquette CH, Padovani B. Organizing pneumonia: What is it? A concep­tual approach and pictorial review. Diag Interv Imaging. 2014;95:771-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2014.01.004

13. Roberton BJ, Hansell DH. Organizing pneumonia: a kaleidoscope of conceptsand morphologies. Eur Radiol. 2011;21:2244-54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2191-6

14. Marquis KM, Hammer MH, Steinbrecher K, et al. CT Ap­proach to Lung Injury. Radiographics 2023;43:e220176. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.220176

15. Lee KS, Kullnig P, Hartman TE, Müller NL. Cryptogenic organizing pneumonia: CT findings in 43 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;162:543-6. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.162.3.8109493

16. REAL ACADEMIA ESPAÑOLA: Diccionario de la lengua española, 23.ª ed., [versión 23.6 en línea]. <https://dle.rae.es> [16.09.2023].

17. Hansell DM, Bankier AA, MacMahon H, McLoud TC, Mül­ler NL, Remy J. Fleischner Society: glossary of terms for thoracic imaging. Radiology. 2008;246:697-722. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2462070712

18. Voloudaki AE, Bouros DE, Froudarakis ME, Dat­seris GE, Apos-tolaki EG, Gourtsoyiannis NC. Cres­centic and ring-shapedopacities. CT features in two cases of bronchiolitis obliteransorganizing pneumo­nia (BOOP). Acta Radiol. 1996;37:889-92. https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851960373P289

19. Godoy MC, Viswanathan C, Marchiori E, Truong MT, Benveniste MF, Rossi S. The reversed halo sign: Update and differential diagnosis. Br J Radiol 2012;85:1226-35. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/54532316

20. Marchiori E, Zanetti G, Hochhegger B. Reversed halo sign. J Bras Pneumol. 2015;41:564. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1806-37562015000000235

21. Kim SJ, Lee KS, Ryu YH, Yoon YC, Choe KO, Kim TS, et al. Reversed halo sign on high-resolution CT of cryptogenic organizing pneumonia: diagnostic implications. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180:1251-4. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.180.5.1801251

22. Arenas-Jiménez JJ, García-Garrigós E, Ureña Vacas A, Sirera Matilla M, Feliú Rey E. Organizing pneumonia. Radiología (Engl Ed). 2022;64 Suppl 3:240-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rxeng.2022.08.002

23. Yoo J-W, Song JW, Jang SJ, et al. Comparison between cryptogenic organizing pneumonia and connective tissue disease-related organizing pneumonia. Rheumatology. 2011;50:932-38. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keq410

24. Poletti V, Cazzato S, Minicuci N, et al. The diagnostic value of bronchoalveolar lavage and transbronchial lung biopsy in cryptogenic organizing pneumonia. Eur Respir J. 1996;9:2513- 6. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.96.09122513

25. Liyun M, Yongsheng W, Yan L, et al. Lesion with morpho­logic feature of organizing pneumonia (OP) in CT-guided lung biopsy samples for diagnosis of bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia (BOOP): a retrospective study of 134 cases in a single center. J Thorac Dis. 2014;6:1251-60.

26. Ravaglia C, Wells AU, Tomassetti S, Gurioli C, Gurioli C, Dubini A, et al. Diagnostic yield and risk/benefit analysis of trans-bronchial lung cryobiopsy in diffuse parenchymal lung diseases: a large cohort of 699 patients. BMC Pulm Med. 2019;19:16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-019-0780-3

27. Zhou Y, Wang L, Huang M, et al. A long-term retrospective study of patients with biopsy-proven cryptogenic organizing pneumonia. Chron Respir Dis. 2019;16:1479973119853829. https://doi.org/10.1177/1479973119853829

28. Lazor R, Vandevenne A, Pelletier A, et al. Cryptogenic Or­ganizing Pneumonia Characteristics of Relapses in a Series of 48 Patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;162:571-7. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.162.2.9909015

29. Saito Z, Kaneko Y, Hasegawa T, et al. Predictive factors for relapse of crytogenic organizing pneumonia. BMC Pulm Med; 2019;19:10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-018-0764-8

Compartir Artículo
Galería de imágenes
Mujer joven con afectación pulmonar bilateral y alteración de la conciencia

Autores:

Churin Lisandro
Ibarrola Manuel

img Ir ahora
Esta es una publicación
Open Access